Skip to main content

Conglomeration

Conglomeration

Yesterday in class we learned about conglomeration. Conglomeration is two or more corporation combing and operation together. 

An Example of conglomeration:

Disney( The head of the corporation) owns or owns parts of.....
Lucasfilm(which owns star wars), Marvel, Pixar, ABC, ESPN

Disney was originally just a film company but then bought multiple different companies, a reason why conglomerations are built are that one company feels threatened by another so they just combine or one of those companies buys out the other. In this case, Disney felt threatened by Pixar so they bought that company.

Pros and Cons of conglomerations:

Pros:
-Conglomerations make more money. When two companies combine you tend to not need that many more people, for example, you don't need two human resources or two accounting branches. Therefore you don't need to pay as many people, so you make more money.
-Like I mentioned previously when one company feel threatened by each other they either will buy or combine the companies. This cause there to be less competition, which can make it easier to sell their products.

Cons:
- When two companies combine the two corporations fire people because they don't need as many jobs.
- A bigger company means more mass productions which means their products are lower quilty.
- There is less room for originality.
- There can be fewer brands and options for the consumer 

What is an illegal Conglomeration?

In the U.S there are some illegal conglomerations. For example, a "Horizontal Conglomeration" is illegal. When someone has a monopoly on a specific product that is considered a "Horizontal Conglomeration". The reason this is illegal is that one company basically controls that produced and can raise and lower the price whenever. This would put to much power into that one companies hands.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Demassification

Demassification In my previous blogs, I talked a lot about mass communication, however, I never mentioned demassification. Demassification is when something goes from being popular and reaching a mass audience too not being popular and reach a niche audience. A niche audience is a fraction of a mass audience. How radio has gone through the process of demassification A good example of demassification is radio. Radio used to be a very popular source of mass communication in the 60's they attempted to reach out to everyone on radio stations, families, adults, teens, etc. However, that is not the case anymore, when television was invented it soon too radios place. After this the radio started to reach out to a niche audience, some radio stations only played classical music and some only play pop. This caused the radio to demassify. An important thing to note when looking for demassification in the modern world is that demassifi...

Non-news worthy stories on front page of the WLKY's website

 Today When I was scanning the front page of WLKY and noticed that they had a story titled" Alexa, Baby Shark!’ Little girl begs Alexa to play her favorite song ". The first thought that went through my head was how is this news worthie, the second thought that when through my head was, why is this on the front page of the website? And this is not the first time WLKY had done this, many times have they used nonnews worthie stories and put them in the front page of the website.     Another example of s non-news worthie story is, " 13 dogs who already have their Halloween costumes ready" .  Although this story is very cute, it has no impact on the reader or anyone else in the community, showing that it is not news worthie. WLKY also put this story on the front page of there website one day, a good news organization should always put news worthie stories on the front page.       When WLKY puts non-newsworthy stori...

Thoughts About WLKY: Name of man killed in Clarksville shooting released

Title: Name of man killed in Clarksville shooting released     When reading this article about a man who got shot by a neighbor because he was abusing his wife and her 9-year-old daughter, I found that it had little relevance and impact to the people living in the community. When writing the story, the journalist did not implicate how this affects members of the community or why this affects them.    The journalists just told us what happened, the killer's name, and that there will be no charges on the man that killed the abuse of husband. These are all things stated by the police, showing that this is is not following one of the seven-yard stick, enterprise. Enterprise is when a journalist is actively seeking answers to questions asked by the community, however, this story is not doing this, but instead just repeating what the police said.  They did not ask the witnesses or interview the wife or daughter. This causes the s...