Skip to main content

Conglomeration

Conglomeration

Yesterday in class we learned about conglomeration. Conglomeration is two or more corporation combing and operation together. 

An Example of conglomeration:

Disney( The head of the corporation) owns or owns parts of.....
Lucasfilm(which owns star wars), Marvel, Pixar, ABC, ESPN

Disney was originally just a film company but then bought multiple different companies, a reason why conglomerations are built are that one company feels threatened by another so they just combine or one of those companies buys out the other. In this case, Disney felt threatened by Pixar so they bought that company.

Pros and Cons of conglomerations:

Pros:
-Conglomerations make more money. When two companies combine you tend to not need that many more people, for example, you don't need two human resources or two accounting branches. Therefore you don't need to pay as many people, so you make more money.
-Like I mentioned previously when one company feel threatened by each other they either will buy or combine the companies. This cause there to be less competition, which can make it easier to sell their products.

Cons:
- When two companies combine the two corporations fire people because they don't need as many jobs.
- A bigger company means more mass productions which means their products are lower quilty.
- There is less room for originality.
- There can be fewer brands and options for the consumer 

What is an illegal Conglomeration?

In the U.S there are some illegal conglomerations. For example, a "Horizontal Conglomeration" is illegal. When someone has a monopoly on a specific product that is considered a "Horizontal Conglomeration". The reason this is illegal is that one company basically controls that produced and can raise and lower the price whenever. This would put to much power into that one companies hands.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Demassification

Demassification In my previous blogs, I talked a lot about mass communication, however, I never mentioned demassification. Demassification is when something goes from being popular and reaching a mass audience too not being popular and reach a niche audience. A niche audience is a fraction of a mass audience. How radio has gone through the process of demassification A good example of demassification is radio. Radio used to be a very popular source of mass communication in the 60's they attempted to reach out to everyone on radio stations, families, adults, teens, etc. However, that is not the case anymore, when television was invented it soon too radios place. After this the radio started to reach out to a niche audience, some radio stations only played classical music and some only play pop. This caused the radio to demassify. An important thing to note when looking for demassification in the modern world is that demassification is not losing the audience but reacting to

Steps to Mass Communication

Steps to Mass Communication In my last blog, I talked about mass communication, what it was and how it affected you. In this blog, I will explain the 5 steps that it takes to form mass communication. All of which we talked about in journalism class. Step 1: The Stimulus The stimulus is where it all starts. A person starts off with an idea, an example that I will be using throughout these steps is my blog. My stimulus would be my idea/assignment to write about topics that have come up n journalism class. Step 2: Encoding  Encoding is the step where you began making your idea into a produced. So in my example, I would be typing up and editing my blog. Step 3: transmission  Transmission is a crucial par to mass communication. It is where your idea gets transferred out for the world to see. In my case, the transmission part would only include me hitting the publish button. However, in another case, it can be a very long process, like the disturbing book possibly across the worl

J1 media critique "Toddler killed after being struck by vehicle in southwest Louisville"

Media Critique "Toddler killed after being struck by vehicle in southwest Louisville" - WLKY     On WLKY's news website I found an article that talked about a mother in Louisville accidentally hitting her toddler with the car.  This story does not follow all 7  rules of the 7 Yardsticks of Journalism . Although this story did take place in Louisville it had little relevance to the actual citizens of Louisville, which means it does not follow the first yardstick, "newsworthiness". This story does not affect a lot of people for a long time, sure it does affect the child's family for a long time, but otherwise, it does not really affect anyone else. Away the journalist could have made this story more relevant is by talking about the importance of an adult supervisor and then listed multiple similar events happening.     When reading this article and watching the video I noticed how they had sources that were not that reliable, which is not following th